Everything below is computed by the production scoring engine from a synthetic set of amplifiers — the shares, tiers, multipliers and damping are real outputs, the people are not. A run on your own post has the same shape, with real handles.
Post
@halcyonproto
Author audience
3.4K followers
Pool
2.0M $HALO
Recipients
18 of 20
What the post did
Reach people reacted to
725K
of 748K total — the rest drew no measurable human response
Unsupported reach
4%
2 of 20 amplifiers delivered 23K impressions with under 2 reactions per 1,000
Total reach
748K
184K on the post · 564K from everyone else
Carried by others
75%
share of reach that came from audiences you don't own
Audience multiple
220×
total reach against your own follower count
Amplifiers
20
9 quoted · 7 replied · 4 reposted
Concentration
92%
share of earned reach delivered by the top 10
Reactions per 1K
11.6
3 amplifiers delivered 50% of the reach at under half this rate
Paid-ads floor
$2,319+
just the impressions, bought at a $3.10 X-ads CPM. Ads can't buy an endorsement or the reshares it keeps earning.
The post itself
10.8
reactions per 1,000 impressions on your own post
The line that usually lands hardest is concentration: 92% of the earned reach came from ten people. A launch that looks like a crowd is almost always a handful of accounts and a long tail — which is the argument for weighting a pool rather than splitting it evenly.
The full board
#Rank by score. The score weighs the reach they delivered, how many people reacted to it, how far it went past their own followers, and how early they showed up.
AmplifierEveryone who quoted, replied to or reposted the post. The chips show what they did, and "post ↗" opens their post. A "damped" line means a trust signal lowered their score, and it says which one.
ReachViews on their own quote or reply, as X counts them. A figure with ~ is an estimate from their follower count: X gives a repost no view count of its own. Estimates never enter the totals.
YieldTheir reach divided by their follower count. Above 1× means the post travelled past their own followers.
Per 1KLikes, reposts, replies and bookmarks per 1,000 views of their post. The small figure compares it with the median on this board (1.0× = typical). Under 2 per 1,000 counts as reach that drew no reaction.
First touchTime from the original post to their first quote, reply or repost. Earlier support scores a little higher.
ShareTheir part of the total score on this board. All shares add up to 100%. "cap" means the row hit the per-person maximum and the rest went back to everyone else.
AllocationThe pool amount their share converts to.
damped ×0.10 — Under 30 followers · Follows 272.2× more accounts than follow back · No bio · Nothing written beyond a link
900
50.0×
0.00.0×
T+6m
0.0%
—
A reach figure marked ~ is modelled from the amplifier's audience rather than measured — X reports no separate view count for a repost. Modelled reach never enters the totals above.
Model settings
Reach damping
impressions ^ 0.65
Action weights
quote 1 · reply 0.55 · repost 0.35
Per-wallet cap
15%
Claim floor
0.05%
Earliness half-life
~12h
Implausible yield
> 50× followers
Coverage & caveats
Example run on a made-up project — no real accounts, no real pool.
Pool funds 18 of 20 amplifiers above the 0.05% claim floor — the rest scored too low to be worth a claim transaction.
2 accounts flagged · 0.8% of raw score withheld by trust damping