AI visibility check

See what ChatGPT says about your product.

Real people ask your buying questions and send back the answers. You get what was said, how often you came up, and who got named instead.

Report in four days. Every answer checked at the source.

asked: best analytics tool for solo founders

“For a one-person team you want something you can set up in an afternoon. Northsky is usually the easiest to get running, though most people start with Plausible or Fathom…”

ChatGPT · Plus · PortugalMentioned — 2nd of 6
Asked across
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiPerplexity
What comes back

What the AI really thinks of your product.

Not a score out of a black box — the real answers, quoted: what the models get right, where they're skeptical about you, and a ranked list of fixes to change what they tell your buyers next.

How often you come up

Across 30 buying questions and 40 people, the share of answers that name you at all.

Who gets named instead

The competitors appearing in the same answers, in the order they appear, and the sources cited.

The exact sentences

Verbatim quotes of how you're described. Usually the part that gets forwarded internally.

Why we use people

The same question gets different answers.

These assistants personalize. The answer depends on who's asking — their history, their plan, their country. So we ask from real accounts instead of a blank one.

Portugal
ChatGPT Plus
Memory on
Mentioned — 2nd
United States
ChatGPT Free
Memory off
Not mentioned
Germany
ChatGPT Plus
Memory off
Mentioned — 5th
United Kingdom
ChatGPT Free
Memory on
Not mentioned

One question, four people, two never hear your name. Tools that probe the API get one of these and call it your visibility. You get the spread, and which segments you're missing.

The report

We ran it on ourselves. Read the whole thing.

Before we sell you a report, here's a real one — the exact check, run on ProductClank. The verdict, what the models praise, where they're skeptical, and the ranked fixes.

AI visibility report· ProductClank

Both models call ProductClank “a real platform” and “a clever execution of a real trend.” They love the structural bet — performance-only rewards, creators as partners. But independently, almost every transcript lands on the same two doubts: the amplification mechanics flirt with platform ToS, and the growth story is “good vibes, thin evidence.” Bottom line, in Claude’s words: promising directionally — but they’d want to see verifiable outcomes before committing budget. Which is exactly what the last quarter of shipping has been about — every flag below now carries what we did about it.

What they praise
  • Performance-only rewards align incentives. “Creators earn when milestones are hit, not just for posting” — repeatedly called a smart structural choice that “aligns incentives better than flat-fee influencer deals.”
  • Creators framed as partners, not ad channels. Flagged as “a meaningful differentiation from traditional influencer marketing platforms.” The framing itself is the moat.
  • “No upfront spend, no equity” fits the audience. “Genuinely well-suited to cash-poor, time-rich Web3 and early-stage startups. Cheaper and faster than traditional influencer deals.”
What they flag
  • 1. Coordinated amplification looks like a ToS risk. Likes / retweets / bookmarks “on demand” were flagged in nearly every response as sitting “uncomfortably close to engagement manipulation,” carrying “real platform-policy risk on X.”
  • 2. Thin, unverifiable evidence. “No independent third-party reviews (G2, Trustpilot) or named case studies — most of what's public is the company's own site and blog posts.” The “95–98% cost savings” figure was called out directly as “marketing copy, not audited data.”
  • 3. Incentives can erode the authenticity CLG runs on. “Community-led growth works best when the community genuinely believes in the product. Incentivized content at scale can erode authenticity fast — the thing that makes CLG valuable in the first place.”
View a sample report Real answers, quoted — plus the ranked fixes. Opens in a new tab.
How it runs

You bring the questions. We do the rest.

01

Send your questions

The things buyers actually ask. We turn them into a prompt set and pick the segments.

02

The panel asks

Verified people, fresh chat, assigned question, own account. Every answer checked at the source.

03

You get the report

Numbers, quotes, method. Nobody on the panel is paid more when your name shows up.

Get paid to ask

Or get paid to ask.

A few questions a week from the account you already use. One person, one account.

Find out what your buyers are being told.

Run a check